On mRNA Jabs for Kids
How many kids have to be maimed and killed for a jab hardly anyone needs before pharmaceutical immunity and guaranteed income is called genocide?
My last post on the Great Reckoning 2023 was well received. It had more likes and comments than any other post, about 4 times the average views, and the second most views after my post on a conservative counter revolution. I shopped it around a lot more than I normally do. There are 18 new subscribers. Welcome! The response suggests more fiction making a mockery of our betters might be welcome from my readers? I like to think there is more there. I have a special Halloween fantasy post in waiting. I was wondering what to write about in the meantime.
On Mickey Z’s substack I commented.
1. eliminating liability.
2. Keeping their jobs. To question the jabs is to lose your job at the CDC/FDA/NIH or just about any hospital.
3. Eugenics.
4. Depopulation.
5. All those harms will lead to even more medical spending - which is most of the basis of the medical industry.
6. They have sold their soul. (which is related to #2)
7. They hate kids?
8. Mass Psychosis
9. The raw exertion of power
10. Because these people advocating for this are empty, shallow, thoughtless and otherwise banal aka Ahrendtian evil.
These of course are hypotheses. Notice I did not list, it will protect kids, it will prevent spread, it will protect teachers, protect elders, etc. because I do not hypothesize bullshit. The CDC in their press release did not offer any rational at all. None. In it they do not even claim kids need the jab. I would encourage you to read the CDC Press Release about this, and compare it to my list, and ask yourself which is closer to reality?
I don’t think they were voting to protect kids, they were voting to give themselves immunity and a guaranteed income.
I commented here about that:
Everything about globohomo and the woke requires coercion, coercion requires force, and cancel culture is that force. Why did the CDC just vote unanimously to recommend the Covid jab for babies? Mostly it is to eliminate all liability. But also, if you aren't unanimous in all things mRNA jab, you don't work for, associate with or get funding from CDC, FDA, NIH. That is both coercion and force.
I don't have much sympathy now though, for the argument that "I just need to get to retirement, but the benefits, my insurance, I have to feed my family, etc, now that they have tripled down on jabs for babies. You don't get to complain about the coercion and force preventing you from taking a stand once it starts looking like genocide.
I don’t have kids. so the fight for kids, with jabs, with school, I have always stood outside of. Not my fight, I told myself. But I have a niece and nephew I love who are still in school, many people I know have kids I care about. How many lines do the “boosters” of mRNA have to cross, how many kids do they maim and kill for a jab hardly anyone needs, before America says enough?
Toby Rogers has been a true leader on this. I don’t generally give money to pols, but I gave $19.86 to Ron Johnson and Ron DeSantis, because of this post, and I’m thinking of giving to the campaign of Kari Lake in Arizona. Whatever you think of their politics, they are the three most prominent politicians in America critical of Covid Policy, and Kari Lake of late has been a star in this regard. (I will say, when I gave that money to DeSantis, the website didn’t even route me to a thank you page, just another page asking for more money.)
In light of the upcoming election, I thought I might offer these again for anyone who hasn’t seen them. I don’t think the Republican party is going to save us necessarily, but with enough public pressure we could force them to hold hearings on the jabs and Covid Policy. Make it clear any way you can.
Of import too:
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/repeal-the-national-childhood-vaccine
Iatrogenocide, what a perfect word for the times...