Discussion about this post

User's avatar
josh's avatar

I've read some of Nickson's work and it appears in my inbox, but I haven't read any lately, mostly for some of the reasons you described. Yes she makes good points and has some understandably righteous indignation, but can also be quite extreme, and what I feel is a lack of empathy or understanding of other possibilities. I appreciate your analysis and the way you wove that into your piece, pointing it out without being hostile or condemnatory.

I've been wondering whether I want to want to use the word "occult", because I could just use "esoteric" instead. People get so attached to their meanings and the words they assign to their meanings. Especially with the word "occult"; I really doubt that some people will ever be able, or even try, to understand the sense in which you use it, because of the extremity of their associations with the word. I think it is brave of you to continue to use that word, and I wonder if I am a coward for preferring a word like "esoteric".

Expand full comment
jacob silverman's avatar

Well, this looks quite promising. I will try to leave it open on my browser so I can read it. In the beginning, it reminds me what Andrew Beaton (American Lit) is always telling me about what he calls "self-care." I felt like he was haranguing me, though. I had not appreciated what "born on the fourth" is doing until now. It looks like something good to read. I cannot write something like this. I write in spurts, and I only cover one topic at a time. I couldn't make a list. But I agree with what I have read so far. A person can get it right on all the specific points and miss the point of keeping watch on one's own equilibrium and balance and health.

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts